The recent World Congress Against Fascism, Neofascism and Similar Expressions taking place in Venezuela from September 10 to September 12, 2024, has sparked intense debate and criticism regarding the authenticity of Nicolás Maduro’s regime. Although it presents itself as a global effort to combat authoritarian ideologies, this event becomes a paradox, given that the very government organizing it has been accused of practices that align with those extreme ideologies.
The Hypocrisy of the Regime
Nicolás Maduro has used the discourse of the fight against fascism to disqualify his political opponents, accusing them of being “fascists” and “neoliberals.” Despite portraying himself as a defender of democracy, the regime has imposed repressive policies that limit freedom of expression, attack press freedom, and violate human rights. The arbitrary detention of opposition leaders, threats against the media, and the repression of peaceful protests are practices that contradict the fundamental values of a democratic society.
A Context of Repression
Since Maduro took power, Venezuela has experienced an alarming deterioration of its democratic institutions. The National Assembly, initially controlled by the opposition, has been stripped of its power, and elections have faced international criticism for a lack of transparency and fair conditions. In this context, the regime has used antifascist rhetoric as a tool to justify its authoritarian measures, diverting attention from its own oppressive conduct.
Political Instrumentalization and Delegitimization of the Opposition
The inauguration of the congress by Delcy Rodríguez, along with speeches centered on “unity” against fascism, seems more an attempt to consolidate the regime’s power than a genuine effort to combat extremist ideologies. This event can be seen as a forum to reaffirm the official narrative that demonizes the opposition and international actors, diverting attention from the real issues facing the country. Rodríguez’s accusations regarding a plan to delegitimize elections suggest an authoritarian approach that silences critical voices and perpetuates a lack of pluralism.
Disconnection from Social Reality
Holding a congress of this magnitude in a context of economic and humanitarian crisis is deeply problematic. Instead of addressing the urgent needs of the population, such as shortages of food and medicine, the regime opts for an event that appears more a political spectacle than a solution to real problems. This reinforces the perception that the leadership is disconnected from the daily concerns of citizens.
Manipulation of Historical Narrative
The tribute to the martyrs of coups in the region, while relevant, is used selectively. The lack of adequate mention of the regime’s own history of human rights violations reveals a lack of self-criticism and manipulation of history to justify present actions. This approach does not contribute to true reconciliation or the construction of an inclusive collective memory.
Conclusion: A Call to Action and Reflection
The World Congress Against Fascism in Venezuela is a clear example of how authoritarian regimes can manipulate political discourse to their advantage. The international community must not only remain vigilant but also demand true accountability, both from fascism in its many forms and from those who, under the banner of the fight against extremism, perpetuate injustice and oppression. The lack of self- criticism, political instrumentalization, and the use of a manipulated historical narrative contribute to an atmosphere of repression and distrust. It is crucial to promote an approach that prioritizes democracy, human rights, and inclusive dialogue to effectively address the complexities of the Venezuelan context. The fight for human rights and democracy must be a genuine effort, guided by ethical principles, and not a mere rhetorical tool in the hands of those who govern with an iron fist. The irony of this congress should serve as a call to action: to ensure that the fight against fascism does not become a tool of oppression, but rather a true effort for freedom and justice in Venezuela.
